Check out the video for yourself to see the intriguing results. Is the Fujifilm X100V a secret macro camera? From the look of these photos, it certainly does deliver results that have a macro look to them. The difference between the two cameras is incredible when you see the images, despite the fact they both have 23mm Fujinon lenses. He then contrasts this by showing us the same concept with the Fujifilm X-T3 with the 23mm f/1.4 lens attached. Moving the camera closer and closer to the figurines, Gabha takes a series of photos showing just how close the X100V can focus. In his latest video, Harmeet Gabha brilliantly demonstrates this short focusing distance using Lego figurines as models. What you may not know about the X100V is that it can focus at a distance of just 10 cm (4 inches). I shoot with a variety of bodies these days (D850, D500, D7200, X-T2), but none of them intrinsically produce quite such pleasing results.The X100V boasts some impressive features, including a leaf shutter, a fast 23mm f/2 Fujinon lens, and Fujifilm’s famous range of JPG film simulations. The DR was amazing (none of that ETTR stuff, just middle the exposure, and pull the highlights), but you had to watch out for highlight noise if you made a big pull, because the sensor just worked that way. I tried profiling my S5 once in ACR, but much preferred the unprofiled results!!!įunny thing about the S5 was that it was slightly quirky. Other cameras always seem like hard work, like I had to work at it just to get something I liked. Shots looked great straight out of the camera, but I could play with the raws to my heart's content, all the while knowing that, hey, it looked great when I started, and all I was doing was pushing each shot to where I wanted it to be.
I could take a shot with that "lowly" 6mp sensor, and it was just fun to work with. It is, to me, hands down the most rewarding camera I've owned.
Oh, and as a jpeg shooter, I'll say this: if you aren't getting batter jpeg images SOOC with a newer version of the 100 series cameras, you're doing something wrong. It's what I'd call 'charming,' I still think dearly of it, because it's the camera that got me into Fuji, but to say that the image quality is better that any later X100 series cameras is just foolishly romanticizing something from the past. And every time I do, I think 'this is cute.' The menu's a puzzle, and shooting above ISO 1600 is a crap shoot -not to mention how quickly the battery drains. Listen, I currently use my 'F,' and I've still got my old X100, which I pull out from time to time. The change from rotating selector dial to joystick, and D-pad don't count as real changes to you? How about the huge EVF changes? If you aren't aware of the constant improvement in AF speed, resolution, menu improvements, and handling, you don't really know the 100 series cameras. William I've owned them all, except the S.
0 kommentar(er)
